Re: configure datatype name > 31?

Sorry, this is a duplicate sent before I subscribed to the group--it was
stalled, so I resent after subscribing. This question has been answered.

Thanks,

// mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Mark McEahern
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:12 AM
> To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [ADMIN] configure datatype name > 31?
>
>
> Hi, the name datatype, which is used at least here:
>
> pg_database.datname
> pg_shadow.usename
>
> is a 31 character field. That seems awfully low. For instance,
> what if I'm
> silly enough to want to make a database named:
>
> customer_GUID
>
> where GUID is something like:
>
> 0ff7d0cc-7394-4b15-a28e-7018b1056f9c
>
> You can imagine I have many customers, each with their own
> database; since I
> use a guid to distinguish the customers, it makes most sense to
> me to use a
> guid to distinguish their databases.
>
> Since GUIDs (in that form at least) are 36 characters, I'm already SOL. I
> can condense the data, but I'd really much rather just use it like it is.
>
> SQL Server 2000, for example, uses nvarchar(256) for the sysname field,
> which seems to perform a similar function.
>
> Is there a way to configure PostgreSQL to make the name field larger?
>
> Thanks,
>
> // mark
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>