| From: | Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql feature |
| Date: | 2004-08-19 00:20:05 |
| Message-ID: | Mahogany-0.66.0-2268-20040818-202005.00@averillpark.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:29:03 -0400 Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com> wrote:
> If you use it enough, I think it is inevitable that something,
> sometime, somewhere will really honk you
> off about Oracle. With the feature bloat they're into these days, very
> likely it will be something
> you care nothing about that does it, too.
the size of the frigging download is enough to honk nearly
anyone off.
the thing is what, two orders of magnitude bigger than all of
PostgreSQL?
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | yateen joshi | 2004-08-19 05:34:27 | Vacuum, per table or entire database? what is better? |
| Previous Message | Adam Ruth | 2004-08-18 23:32:34 | Re: Postgresql feature |