| From: | Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql on file system EXT2 or EXT3 |
| Date: | 2003-11-27 18:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | Mahogany-0.66.0-19024-20031127-131513.00@averillpark.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:03:41 -0500 "Keith C. Perry" <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com> wrote:
> Quoting Carmen Wai <wai_carmen(at)hotmail(dot)com>:
> > records to the two machines, I found that the machine with EXT2 insert much
> > quicker than the other with EXT3.
> > Is postgresqk perform better with EXT2 file system?
> Keep in mind that with a journaling type fs, you have additional overhead for
> the journal. I've heard people make this comment before about EXT 3 being
> slower that EXT 2.
based on what i've heard hanging out on various postgresql lists, try EXT3
with journaling of meta data only for the database files.
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | javier garcia - CEBAS | 2003-11-27 18:16:56 | 7.3.4 and 7.4 ORDER in queries |
| Previous Message | Keith C. Perry | 2003-11-27 18:03:41 | Re: Postgresql on file system EXT2 or EXT3 |