| From: | Sacheen Birhade <sacheen(dot)birhade(at)veritas(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, KK CHN <kkchn(dot)in(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [External] Re: WAL Replication query |
| Date: | 2022-11-01 06:55:44 |
| Message-ID: | MW4PR20MB45255296CA7F85445C000A16F3369@MW4PR20MB4525.namprd20.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Yes, Laurenz. You are right.
-----Original Message-----
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 12:23 PM
To: Sacheen Birhade <sacheen(dot)birhade(at)veritas(dot)com>; KK CHN <kkchn(dot)in(at)gmail(dot)com>; pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query
On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 06:44 +0000, Sacheen Birhade wrote:
> If replication is in asynchronous then there will be data loss, right Laurenz?
Why? The data will perhaps show up on the standby a little later, but why is that data loss? Remember that the question was about replication, and there was no mention of failover.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sacheen Birhade | 2022-11-01 07:00:39 | finding best possible new master in case of failover? |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2022-11-01 06:53:12 | Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query |