From: | Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Firebird and PostgreSQL at the DB Corral. |
Date: | 2003-12-21 23:49:49 |
Message-ID: | MPG.1a5041f4bcc475339896bb@news.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net says...
> > What then is a derived table, or is a derived table just a synonym for
> > inline view?
> I'm not sure what the "official" name for this is. I have heard both. So
> from my point of view a derived table and an inline view are the same.
OK - I'm fine with the idea that there can be more than one name for the
same thing, and that different geographies and/or cultures can mean that
people use synonyms.
I've recently started looking at Oracle as well - boy oh boy, you'd want
to know your FTLA's with that system!
> > What's wrong with SELECT COUNT(col1) FROM table?
> Nothing. But my statement was just an example to show the syntax.
> But sometimes when things get more complicated it *is* very handy, and I
> have used it now and then, and wouldn't want to miss it :-)
OK, fine. Can you show me an example of where your construct (inline
view and/or derived table) behaves differently from and is better than
the syntax that I used?
Paul...
> Thomas
--
plinehan x__AT__x yahoo x__DOT__x com
C++ Builder 5 SP1, Interbase 6.0.1.6 IBX 5.04 W2K Pro
Please do not top-post.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-22 01:45:11 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-12-21 23:43:07 | Re: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON 2004 |