RE: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 13:36
To: ldh(at)laurent-hasson(dot)com
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>; Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>; David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Big performance slowdown from 11.2 to 13.3

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:33 AM ldh(at)laurent-hasson(dot)com <ldh(at)laurent-hasson(dot)com> wrote:
> Damn... I know Windows is a lower priority, and this is yet another issue, but in Healthcare, Windows is so prevalent everywhere...

To be clear, I didn't actually say that. I said that it doesn't matter either way, as far as addressing this long standing "int64 vs long"
issue goes.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Yes, agreed Peter... The "lower priority" issue was mentioned, but not in terms of the applicability of the fix overall. Personally, I would prefer going the size_t route vs int/long/int64 in C/C++/. Of course, as a user, I'd love a patch on V13 and something cleaner in V14.

Thanks,
Laurent.