| From: | Daulat Ram <Daulat(dot)Ram(at)exponential(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Barman |
| Date: | 2019-10-31 17:29:34 |
| Message-ID: | MN2PR01MB5854D3BA0EBEEC8EDA58CE1A9B630@MN2PR01MB5854.prod.exchangelabs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi All,
We have configured postgres 11.2 in streaming replication (primary & Standby) on docker and I am looking to initiate the Postgres backup using barman. As I know there are few options for taking backup using barman.
RSYNC backup
Incremental Backups
Streaming Backup with continuous WAL streaming
Centralized and Catalogued Backups
Which is the best option for backup using barman? So that we can keep the database safe in case of disaster? I feel the Incremental Backups are most useful to perform the PITR but I want to know the experts suggestions.
Thanks,
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-10-31 18:56:46 | Re: Barman |
| Previous Message | Mitar | 2019-10-31 16:48:43 | Re: Automatically parsing in-line composite types |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-10-31 18:56:46 | Re: Barman |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2019-10-30 22:31:44 | Re: GIN index on JSONB not used due to lack of nested statistics |