From: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled? |
Date: | 2021-07-16 06:13:07 |
Message-ID: | MEYP282MB1669D80E4B0689E71DD0EF1AB6119@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 14:06, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 8:20 AM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2021 at 18:17, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:43 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Please consider review v3 patch. v3-0001 adds slot_name verification in
>> parse_subscription_options() and comments for why we need disable subscription
>> where set slot_name to NONE.
>>
>
> I think we back-patch this bug-fix till v10 where it was introduced
> and update the comments only in HEAD. So, accordingly, I moved the
> changes into two patches and changed the comments a bit. Can you
> please test the first patch in back-branches? I'll also do it
> separately.
>
Thanks for your review, I'll test the in back-branches.
>> v3-0002 comes from Ranier Vilela, it reduce the
>> overhead strlen in ReplicationSlotValidateName().
>>
>
> I think this patch has nothing to do with this bug-fix, so I suggest
> you discuss this in a separate patch. Personally, I don't think it
> will help in reducing any overhead but there doesn't appear to be any
> harm in changing it as proposed.
Agreed.
--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2021-07-16 06:30:13 | pgbench: using prepared BEGIN statement in a pipeline could cause an error |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2021-07-16 06:08:24 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |