Re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled?

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled?
Date: 2021-07-08 10:13:24
Message-ID: MEYP282MB1669B842CF8D851F5F4DAC73B6199@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 08 Jul 2021 at 17:51, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:25 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, hackers
>>
>> The documentation [1] says:
>>
>> When dropping a subscription that is associated with a replication slot on the
>> remote host (the normal state), DROP SUBSCRIPTION will connect to the remote
>> host and try to drop the replication slot as part of its operation. This is
>> necessary so that the resources allocated for the subscription on the remote
>> host are released. If this fails, either because the remote host is not
>> reachable or because the remote replication slot cannot be dropped or does not
>> exist or never existed, the DROP SUBSCRIPTION command will fail. To proceed in
>> this situation, disassociate the subscription from the replication slot by
>> executing ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name = NONE).
>>
>> However, when I try this, it complains the subscription is enabled, this command
>> requires the subscription disabled. Why we need this limitation?
>>
>
> If we don't have this limitation then even after you have set the slot
> name to none, the background apply worker corresponding to that
> subscription will continue to stream changes via the previous slot.
>

Yeah, thanks for your explain! Should we add some comments here?

>> OTOH, when I execute ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name=''), it doesn't complain. However,
>> SELECT select pg_create_logical_replication_slot('', 'pgoutput') complains slot name is too
>> short. Although, the slot will be created at publisher, and validate the slot name, IMO, we
>> can also validate the slot_name in parse_subscription_options() to get the error early.
>> Attached fixes it. Any thoughts?
>>
>
> Oh, I think this should be fixed. Can anyone else think this to be
> valid behavior?
>

Ranier Vilela provides a v2 patch and reduce the overhead of
ReplicationSlotValidateName() in thread [1].

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQAqLtNJ1wvMKLK8ZH27SGJW5OjizgyMq28bFj-_5QG1G+A@mail.gmail.com

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-07-08 10:17:43 Re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled?
Previous Message Quan Zongliang 2021-07-08 10:02:03 Re: bugfix: when the blocksize is 32k, the function page_header of pageinspect returns negative numbers.