Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sadhuprasad Patro <b(dot)sadhu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber
Date: 2021-10-21 15:32:46
Message-ID: MEYP282MB16699CE73E3338D67651891CB6BF9@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 23:10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 22:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> There's another issue here: the subscriber can run user-defined code
>>> (in triggers), while AFAIK the sender cannot.
>
>> Sorry, I'm not sure about this. Could you give me an example?
>
> If you're doing logical replication into a table that has triggers,
> the replication worker has to execute those triggers.
>

Does that mean we should use the subscriber's settings to set the
replication's parameter (e.g. datestyle)? If we do this, it might
loss precision (for example: extra_float_digits on publisher is 3
and on subscriber is -4), is this accpted?

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-10-21 15:52:08 Re: [PATCH] Fix memory corruption in pg_shdepend.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-10-21 15:10:36 Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber