A question about StartSubTransaction

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: A question about StartSubTransaction
Date: 2022-09-14 05:41:24
Message-ID: MEYP282MB1669506A5ED2DD276F3121B0B6469@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Hi hackers,

I found the StartSubTransaction has the following code:

static void
StartSubTransaction(void)
{
[...]

s->state = TRANS_START;

/*
* Initialize subsystems for new subtransaction
*
* must initialize resource-management stuff first
*/
AtSubStart_Memory();
AtSubStart_ResourceOwner();
AfterTriggerBeginSubXact();

s->state = TRANS_INPROGRESS;

[...]
}

IIRC, AtSubStart_Memory, AtSubStart_ResourceOwner and AfterTriggerBeginSubXact don't
use s->state. Why should we set s->state to TRANS_START and then TRANS_INPROGRESS?

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-09-14 05:52:50 Re: A question about StartSubTransaction
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-09-14 05:40:43 Re: minimum perl version