| From: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18467: postgres_fdw (deparser) ignores LimitOption |
| Date: | 2024-05-16 04:02:14 |
| Message-ID: | ME3P282MB3166635B2A6895BAB182449FB6ED2@ME3P282MB3166.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 17:41, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Onder,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:07 PM PG Bug reporting form
> <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Hi, it seems the same query with `LimitOption` on a heap table and on an
>> postgres_fdw table pointing to the same heap table is returning different
>> results.
>
> Thanks for the report! Will look into this next week, because I am
> busy with something else this week.
>
AppendLimitClause() does not check the limitOption, which may be
LIMIT_OPTION_WITH_TIES. It simply uses the LIMIT clause.
Here is a poc patch to verify the above.
--
Regards,
Japin Li
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| bug#18467.patch | text/x-diff | 788 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2024-05-16 06:27:51 | Re: Postgresql 16.3 installation error (setup file) on Windows 11 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-05-16 03:33:08 | Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae |