Re: Transaction timeout

> 在 2023年12月23日，11:35，Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> 写道：
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:17 AM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> a
>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 10:40, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 08:32, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 23:30, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:44 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 22:37, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:25 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I try to set idle_in_transaction_session_timeout after begin transaction,
>>>>>>>> it changes immediately, so I think transaction_timeout should also be take
>>>>>>>> immediately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ah, right, idle_in_transaction_session_timeout is set after the set
>>>>>>> command finishes and before the backend send *ready for query*
>>>>>>> to the client, so the value of the GUC is already set before
>>>>>>> next command.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I mean, is it possible to set transaction_timeout before next comand?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, it's possible, set transaction_timeout in the when it first
>>>>> goes into *idle in transaction* mode, see the attached files.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for updating the patch, LGTM.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the noise!
>>>
>>> Read the previous threads, I find why the author enable transaction_timeout
>>> in start_xact_command().
>>>
>>> The v15 patch cannot handle COMMIT AND CHAIN, see [1]. For example:
>>>
>>> SET transaction_timeout TO '2s'; BEGIN; SELECT 1, pg_sleep(1); COMMIT AND CHAIN; SELECT 2, pg_sleep(1); COMMIT;
>>>
>>> The transaction_timeout do not reset when executing COMMIT AND CHAIN.
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a906dea1-76a1-4f26-76c5-a7efad3ef5b8%40oss.nttdata.com
>>
>> Attach v16 to solve this. Any suggestions?
>
> I've checked this with *COMMIT AND CHAIN* and *ABORT AND CHAIN*,
> both work as expected. Thanks for the update.
>

Thanks for your testing and reviewing!