| From: | "elein" <elein(at)nextbus(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "elein" <elein(at)nextbus(dot)com> |
| Subject: | oracle ate |
| Date: | 2000-09-28 01:40:56 |
| Message-ID: | MABBJCMLMNABIPABODDHEEBICAAA.elein@nextbus.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Does anyone have a writeup or deconstruction of the
implementation of Oracle's extensibility capabilities?
I am a long time ordbms proponent (illustra, informix and
now postgresql). And I have heard mixed information
regarding Oracle's extensibility. Do they use a unified
type system? Are cartriges separate processes? Do the
separate processes (if they are) share memory with the
server process or is all the communication through pipish
things. If I don't use their standard cartridges (image,
text, video) how easy is it to write my own. Any GIS
specific pro or con info w/Oracle? Am I asking the right
questions?
I would like to put the questions to rest and get on with it.
Feel free to point me to the right audience or source if
this is not a good question for this group.
thanks
elein(at)nextbus(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Smith | 2000-09-28 01:53:16 | warning - virus on the loose. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-28 01:38:05 | Re: Increased BLKSZ, but now pgsql seg-faults? |