| From: | "Alice Bag" <gabeemilybin(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Firebird and PostgreSQL at the DB Corral. |
| Date: | 2003-12-18 01:59:02 |
| Message-ID: | Law11-F103LaA4JGjBW00021fe6@hotmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > The only reason PG views aren't
> > updateable by default is (AIUI) a lack of agreement on how they should
> > work for complex view definitions.
>
>Actually I think it's more that no one has felt like tackling it. The
>SQL spec only requires views to be updatable when they are "sufficiently
>simple", and it turns out that the spec's constraints on "sufficiently
>simple" eliminate all the doubtful cases.
>
> regards, tom lane
Sure would be sweet to have it.
While I'm here I take this chance to say.. PostgreSQL ROCKS! Thanks to
everyone who makes PG great. I'll go back to lurking. G
_________________________________________________________________
Get dial-up Internet access now with our best offer: 6 months @$9.95/month!
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2003-12-18 02:36:29 | Re: sequences not renamed with tables |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-12-18 01:35:48 | Re: Function Returning SETOF Problem |