From: | "Jeff MacDonald" <jeff(at)tsunamicreek(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, "postgres list" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-08-09 17:53:48 |
Message-ID: | LBEELEIJLNEGIFHEOKDICEANCAAA.jeff@tsunamicreek.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I just looked at the PgSQL Inc page, on the projects page there is a link to
www.erserver.com should this be considered current ?
How can one see more details about the commercial replication [maybe even
including a price ?] with out buying it ?
Jeff.
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:46 PM
To: postgres list
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] I am being interviewed by OReilly
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:33:39AM -0700, Ben wrote:
> Replication would help that. Our company would gladly use Postgres instead
> of MS SQL Server if postgres could do replication.
The replication offered by PostgreSQL, Inc. is pretty good, and
certainly good enough for most people's cases. It's commercial. It
certainly works. That it doesn't do hot failover is a gotcha,
though.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M6K 3E3
+1 416 646 3304 x110
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rob Brown-Bayliss | 2002-08-09 20:07:56 | Re: oid's and primary keys on insert |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-08-09 17:03:47 | Re: uncommited question |