| From: | postgresql_contributors <postgresql_contributors(at)newtglobalcorp(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Kiran Suresh Kulkarni <kirans(at)newtglobalcorp(dot)com>, Hari Prasad B <hariprsadb(at)newtglobalcorp(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Guidance Needed for Testing PostgreSQL Patch (CF-5044) |
| Date: | 2024-11-29 11:04:11 |
| Message-ID: | KL1PR03MB55076EA4B0701791EDD39824E12A2@KL1PR03MB5507.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I recently installed and tested the CF-5044 patch using the query provided on the PostgreSQL community page but could not confirm its functionality. I followed the standard process:
1. Applied the patch using git.
2. Rebuilt PostgreSQL from source (./configure, make, make install).
3. Tested with the suggested query after restarting PostgreSQL.
I would appreciate your guidance on verifying patch functionality and ensuring compliance with community testing standards. If there are additional steps or tools I should use, please let me know.
Thank you for your support as I represent Newt Global in contributing to the PostgreSQL community.
Best regards,
Team from Newt Global
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-11-29 11:04:21 | Re: [PATCH] Add log_transaction setting |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-11-29 11:00:13 | Re: EphemeralNamedRelation and materialized view |