From: | "Jason Underdown" <jasonu(at)xmission(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "MT" <m_tessier(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How many fields in a table are too many |
Date: | 2003-06-26 01:29:47 |
Message-ID: | KEEBIBNJGFAENCFHMJPFKEDGCLAA.jasonu@xmission.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Generally speaking, no, not at all. Probably the question you should be
asking yourself is: "Is there a way I could move some of these fields into
other tables?" But, depending upon your application, putting your database
schema into some esoteric normal form may be overkill.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of MT
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:11 PM
> To: GENERAL
> Subject: [GENERAL] How many fields in a table are too many
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick question, not unrelated to my previous question,
> which I don't think will get answered. I have a table with 13
> fields. Is that too many fields for one table.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maksim Likharev | 2003-06-26 01:56:58 | Query plan question |
Previous Message | MT | 2003-06-26 01:11:27 | How many fields in a table are too many |