From: | "Joel Burton" <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "April L" <april(at)i-netco(dot)com>, "PgSQL Novice ML" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is a randomized default value primary key |
Date: | 2002-05-19 22:29:21 |
Message-ID: | JGEPJNMCKODMDHGOBKDNOEMECOAA.joel@joelburton.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
> I made the primary key
>
> "authkey" bigint DEFAULT trunc(random()*10^15) NOT NULL
>
> Does that seem reasonable? bigint is 8 bytes. I came up with this prior to
> receiving your reply.
>
> Since I do have to use the authkey to find records, it seems I would still
> benefit by having an index for it even if I had a separate 4 byte primary
> key - so I don't understand how it would save resources or increase
> performance to avoid making this column the primary key? Admittedly, I
> don't understand indexes in depth yet, I just assumed that every
> additional
> index means additional housekeeping activities each time a record is
> changed or added.
>
> Thank you,
>
> - April
Be sure to build into your app some way of handling the error that will
happen if a random primary key is already in the table -- resubmitting it
should work fine (the odds of this happening twice become _extremely_
unlikely, unless your table is very large)
Anyone know off the top of their heads what the period for PG's random()
function is?
- J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ghaverla | 2002-05-19 22:40:36 | Re: Is a randomized default value primary key |
Previous Message | April L | 2002-05-19 22:19:36 | Re: Is a randomized default value primary key |