From: | "Joel Burton" <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Fran Fabrizio" <ffabrizio(at)mmrd(dot)com>, <rich(at)annexia(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What popular, large commercial websites run PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2002-04-29 18:54:45 |
Message-ID: | JGEPJNMCKODMDHGOBKDNIEBOCMAA.joel@joelburton.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
sourceforge.net runs on PostgreSQL (or at least it did ~8 months ago; this
might have changed)
Joel BURTON | joel(at)joelburton(dot)com | joelburton.com | aim: wjoelburton
Knowledge Management & Technology Consultant
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Fran Fabrizio
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: rich(at)annexia(dot)org
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] What popular, large commercial websites run
> PostgreSQL?
>
>
>
> > which run PostgreSQL as their main database server. Is there any
> webpage or
> > other resource which lists PSQL-backed sites, or can anyone name any
> sites
> > running PSQL for me?
>
> Rich,
>
> I asked essentially this same question a few weeks back (and I'm one of
> a long line of people who've asked the same question if you search the
> archives. =)
>
> The bottom line (and people will disagree with me but I just spent the
> better part of a day trying to answer this question) is that you will
> not find a good source of this information.
>
> People will refer you to the user gallery at pgsql.com. I will tell you
> right now it's not only quite out of date, but does not contain the
> kinds of projects that management would recognize. (This is not to say
> the user gallery is a bad idea - I commend the folks who set it up. But
> it relies on users to provide accurate and current data, and that's not
> happening.)
>
> The best I came up with is that the .info registry is run off of a Pg
> database (I believe there's a post or two about it in the archives, they
> had some fairly impressive stats). Other than that, there's really not
> much in the way of large commercial companies using Pg that are willing
> to advertise that fact.
>
> I also found the tinyest of blurbs that intimated that Verizon Wireless
> used Pg on a project and presented a talk about it at an open source
> database conference in the fall, but I was unable to find any followup
> information.
>
> Finally, there's a project in the state of Texas involving all non-rural
> inpatient hospital records. You'll also be able to read more about that
> in the archives because it was discussed here.
>
> That's not much and didn't go very far in exciting my management but
> that's all I could come up with. It's quite possible that either it's
> not being used by many large commercial corporations (at least in the
> US) or that those corporations are not going to admit that for whatever
> stigma they feel is associated with using open source software.
>
> It's a shame, but what can we do? If you have better luck please let me
> know.
>
> -Fran
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2002-04-29 19:40:26 | Re: What popular, large commercial websites run PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Hubert depesz Lubaczewski | 2002-04-29 18:18:17 | one more time: feature (feature status) request - function overriding table permissions |