| From: | Jürgen Cappel <email(at)juergen-cappel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tony and Bryn Reina" <reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
| Date: | 2004-04-01 19:55:55 |
| Message-ID: | JEEKIPNAKJNCFLMOBKHGMEIEDCAA.email@juergen-cappel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
AFAIK Postgres uses an internal limit of 2 GB per table file with
a lot of files per table to make up some Terabytes. So don't worry!
Let's see what one of the gurus will tell us. Bye.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]Im Auftrag von Tony and Bryn
Reina
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. April 2004 21:15
An: Bradley Kieser
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Betreff: Re: [ADMIN] Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bradley Kieser" <brad(at)kieser(dot)net>
To: "Tony Reina" <reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Do Petabyte storage solutions exist?
let alone the storate limit of 2GB per
> table. So sadly, PG would have to bow out of this IMHO unless someone
> else nukes me on this!
Uh oh, 2 GB limit on table sizes. I did realize the limit was that low.
Would commercial DBMS be the better solution for handling Terabyte databases
and above?
-Tony
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Suresh | 2004-04-01 19:56:56 | Installation Docs for Linux and Windows |
| Previous Message | Tony and Bryn Reina | 2004-04-01 19:17:51 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |