RE: GEQO status?

From: "Andrew Snow" <andrew(at)modulus(dot)org>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: GEQO status?
Date: 2000-12-27 11:59:08
Message-ID: JEEGIJPOJIGGIIHGKOKOOEBCCHAA.andrew@modulus.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I would set Seed per default. Even worse than a bad query path
> is an unpredictable query path. I see no argument, that a random Seed
> would buy us anything.

This kindof bugs me -- if you leave it stuck at a preset value, it makes it
possible to never delve into parts of solution space that have more optimal
solutions than the default seed will ever find. Surely a random seed would
make the solution better on average over a large number of queries.

On the other hand, if the system as a whole is working well, it should not
matter what the seed is.

- Andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2000-12-27 13:46:15 Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Chih-Chang Hsieh 2000-12-27 11:55:47 About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"