From: | "Marie G(dot) Tuite" <marie(dot)tuite(at)edisonaffiliates(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <valerie(at)webtribe(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Top N Records Per Group |
Date: | 2002-08-02 19:09:04 |
Message-ID: | IGELKLINGDMODABPOOFEOEKACFAA.marie.tuite@edisonaffiliates.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
There is a limit which is similar to SQL2K and there is also an offset
option.
select blah from blah limit 5;
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of
> valerie(at)webtribe(dot)net
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:11 AM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Top N Records Per Group
>
>
> Is there a "top" function in postgres? I've had a look and
> don't see one.
>
> As an example: How would I extract the top 5 salesmen PER
> region using Postgres?
>
> TIA
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Wickstrom | 2002-08-02 19:11:17 | Re: MySQL or Postgres ? |
Previous Message | Eric Lee Green | 2002-08-02 19:00:24 | Re: MySQL or Postgres ? |