From: | Fan Liu <fan(dot)liu(at)ericsson(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [Bus error] huge_pages default value (try) not fall back |
Date: | 2020-02-25 01:57:25 |
Message-ID: | HE1PR0701MB2569E6C9F93CFB70EEC163F09EED0@HE1PR0701MB2569.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I had created a new package for my customer with -d for initdb, but they said they can accept current workaround.
As I don't have an NODE has hugepage on, I will not able to collect the logs.
I'd like to thank you again for the supporting and troubleshooting. I think we may close this ticket.
BRs,
Fan Liu
ADP Document Database PG
-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: 2020年2月24日 18:39
To: Fan Liu <fan(dot)liu(at)ericsson(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Bus error] huge_pages default value (try) not fall back
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 3:19 AM Fan Liu <fan(dot)liu(at)ericsson(dot)com<mailto:fan(dot)liu(at)ericsson(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> Attached core dump file, could you take a look?
>
> I can take a look on Monday, but at the same time if you have issues
> on initdb stage you try to run it with -d option and check out
> debugging output, should be helpful.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get a meaningful stack trace from this dump, most likely due to different versions (I hoped that the latest pgdg package with 10 for bionic would fit). But you can also try to post it following this instructions [1].
[1]: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Generating_a_stack_trace_of_a_PostgreSQL_backend
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | RekGRpth | 2020-02-25 02:51:55 | Re: BUG #16258: exec_simple_query does not call ProcessCompletedNotifies after CommitTransactionCommand |
Previous Message | Juan José Santamaría Flecha | 2020-02-24 17:56:05 | Re: BUG #16108: Colorization to the output of command-line has unproperly behaviors at Windows platform |