From: | "REIX, Tony" <tony(dot)reix(at)atos(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | ROS Didier <didier(dot)ros(at)edf(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: impact of SPECTRE and MELTDOWN patches |
Date: | 2018-09-21 09:24:26 |
Message-ID: | HE1PR0202MB28123AE18A7D76368DAB4EAD86120@HE1PR0202MB2812.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Which HW have you experimented with?
Thx/Regards
Cordialement,
Tony Reix
tony(dot)reix(at)atos(dot)net
ATOS / Bull SAS
ATOS Expert
IBM Coop Architect & Technical Leader
Office : +33 (0) 4 76 29 72 67
1 rue de Provence - 38432 Échirolles - France
www.atos.net<https://mail.ad.bull.net/owa/redir.aspx?C=PvphmPvCZkGrAgHVnWGsdMcDKgzl_dEIsM6rX0g4u4v8V81YffzBGkWrtQeAXNovd3ttkJL8JIc.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.atos.net%2f>
________________________________
De : ROS Didier <didier(dot)ros(at)edf(dot)fr>
Envoyé : jeudi 20 septembre 2018 09:23
À : pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Objet : impact of SPECTRE and MELTDOWN patches
Hi
I would like to know what are the recommendation to resolve the problem of performance impact after applying the SPECTRE and MELTDOWN patches ?
Do we have to add more CPUs ?
NB : I have tested on one of our production database and I get an impact of ~25%... Do you have such a result ?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
[cid:image002(dot)png(at)01D14E0E(dot)8515EB90]
Didier ROS
Expertise SGBD
DS IT/IT DMA/Solutions Groupe EDF/Expertise Applicative - SGBD
Nanterre Picasso - E2 565D (aile nord-est)
32 Avenue Pablo Picasso
92000 Nanterre
didier(dot)ros(at)edf(dot)fr<mailto:didier(dot)ros(at)edf(dot)fr>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ROS Didier | 2018-09-21 09:40:15 | RE: impact of SPECTRE and MELTDOWN patches |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-09-21 08:51:14 | Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby |