Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: "James Mansion" <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, "Andreas Kostyrka" <andreas(at)kostyrka(dot)org>, <jason(at)ohloh(dot)net>, "Geoff Tolley" <geoff(at)polimetrix(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-05 19:30:50
Message-ID: HCEPKPMCAJLDGJIBCLGHEENIHGAA.james@mansionfamily.plus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>Server drives are generally more tolerant of higher temperatures. I.e.
>the failure rate for consumer and server class HDs may be about the same
>at 40 degrees C, but by the time the internal case temps get up to 60-70
>degrees C, the consumer grade drives will likely be failing at a much
>higher rate, whether they're working hard or not.

Can you cite any statistical evidence for this?

James

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/746 - Release Date: 04/04/2007
13:09

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Allgood 2007-04-05 19:33:27 Re: High Load on Postgres 7.4.16 Server
Previous Message C. Bergström 2007-04-05 19:28:23 Re: High Load on Postgres 7.4.16 Server