Re: reindex action

From: frank_lupo <frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it>
To: dpage <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reindex action
Date: 2003-03-07 15:16:10
Message-ID: HBDX2Y$857FE207FCB3DB662AD54B1932D8788D@email.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> > > Sorry Frank - this breaks the OO design of pgSchema. Unless
> > there are
> > > exceptional circumstances, anything that occurs to an
> > object should be
> > > implemented as a method of that object, so I would expect to see
> > > methods
> > > like:
> > >
> > > pgIndex.ReIndex()
> > > pgDatabase.ReIndex()
> > > pgTable.ReIndex()
> > >
> > > Can you recode it in that fashion please?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Dave.
> > >
> >
> > Excuse, I have corrected the schema.
>
> Looks good.

I change in basAction the reindex.
I change in basAction the vacuum.
I change the vacuum using OO design of pgSchema:

pgDatabase.vacuum(...)
pgTable.vacuum(...)
pgColumn.vacuum(...)

Bye !!
Frank Lupo (Wolf) !!

/\_ _/\
\ o o /
--ooo-----ooo---

--
Prendi GRATIS l'email universale che... risparmia: http://www.email.it/f

Sponsor:
Realizza un desiderio, con Conto Privilegiato basta un click fare di un sogno realtà.
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=1248&d=7-3

Attachment Content-Type Size
patch.zip application/x-zip-compressed 2.4 KB

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-03-07 15:21:00 Re: reindex action
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-03-07 11:02:36 Re: PGAdmin 3 Patch // Memory Leaks Fixed // Ignore last patch