From: | frank_lupo <frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | dpage <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reindex action |
Date: | 2003-03-07 15:16:10 |
Message-ID: | HBDX2Y$857FE207FCB3DB662AD54B1932D8788D@email.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> > > Sorry Frank - this breaks the OO design of pgSchema. Unless
> > there are
> > > exceptional circumstances, anything that occurs to an
> > object should be
> > > implemented as a method of that object, so I would expect to see
> > > methods
> > > like:
> > >
> > > pgIndex.ReIndex()
> > > pgDatabase.ReIndex()
> > > pgTable.ReIndex()
> > >
> > > Can you recode it in that fashion please?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Dave.
> > >
> >
> > Excuse, I have corrected the schema.
>
> Looks good.
I change in basAction the reindex.
I change in basAction the vacuum.
I change the vacuum using OO design of pgSchema:
pgDatabase.vacuum(...)
pgTable.vacuum(...)
pgColumn.vacuum(...)
Bye !!
Frank Lupo (Wolf) !!
/\_ _/\
\ o o /
--ooo-----ooo---
--
Prendi GRATIS l'email universale che... risparmia: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Realizza un desiderio, con Conto Privilegiato basta un click fare di un sogno realtà.
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=1248&d=7-3
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
patch.zip | application/x-zip-compressed | 2.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-03-07 15:21:00 | Re: reindex action |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-03-07 11:02:36 | Re: PGAdmin 3 Patch // Memory Leaks Fixed // Ignore last patch |