Re: BUG #18880: Can't have a database without having postgres as a db_name and username

From: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "kevenboudreau58(at)gmail(dot)com" <kevenboudreau58(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #18880: Can't have a database without having postgres as a db_name and username
Date: 2025-04-07 07:15:02
Message-ID: GV0P278MB041900D5193C687311D8588ED2AA2@GV0P278MB0419.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

>Like I said I can't have a database with another db_name and username I find
>that frustrating because I need to change these to class myself for my work
>I need multiple database with differents name and username

>Thank you for the support in advance and I hope you will solve that faster!

Can you please describe what you are trying to do exactly? You definitely can have multiple databases with their own owners.

Regards
Daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-04-07 09:37:08 Re: BUG #18815: Logical replication worker Segmentation fault
Previous Message Noah Misch 2025-04-06 18:16:13 Re: BUG #18146: Rows reappearing in Tables after Auto-Vacuum Failure in PostgreSQL on Windows