Re: pg_stat_reset round 2

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: "Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_reset round 2
Date: 2002-08-05 08:00:15
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEICCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> It should be marked volatile (rather than stable), as it has
> side-effects.

OK, I'll fix it.

> Wouldn't PG_RETURN_VOID() be more appropriate than returning true?

I was under the impression that functions used in SELECTs cannot use
PG_RETURN_VOID()...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-05 08:40:00 pg_stat_reset round 3
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-08-05 07:55:17 Re: pg_stat_reset round 2