Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
Date: 2002-09-17 01:30:47
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEEACEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> writes:
> > This seems like a "must" have option for pg_dump,
> > If I was to create a patch would it make it into 7.3?
>
> I dunno ... I'd like to have it too, but it would break our "no new
> features during beta" rule. Comments anyone?

I don't see a huge reason to stick to that rule in this instance...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-09-17 02:04:26 Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-16 23:08:35 Re: directional marks