Re: Proposed GUC Variable

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Date: 2002-08-23 04:26:52
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMENKCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > debug_query_string doesn't necessarily have a lot to do with the
> > proximate cause of the error. Consider queries issued by rules,
> > triggers, plpgsql functions, etc.
>
> Maybe. I think giving the user the string that caused the error is
> probably what they want, rather than a rule or trigger that they can't
> tie back to an actual query.

Yeah, I'd agree with that.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-08-23 05:01:00 psql password prompt
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-23 04:25:19 Another tsearch bug...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-23 04:27:18 Re: another NAMEDATALEN fix
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-23 04:24:59 Re: Proposed GUC Variable