Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Well, we're not doing that; and I see no good reason to make the thing
> > be a builtin function at all. Since it's just an example, it can very
> > well be a contrib item with a creation script. Probably *should* be,
> > in fact, because dynamically created functions are what other people are
> > going to be building; an example of how to do it as a builtin function
> > isn't as helpful.
>
> True enough, although I could always create another example for contrib.
> Returning GUC variable "SHOW ALL" results as a query result has been
> discussed before, and I thought there was agreement that it was a
> desirable backend feature.

Sure would be. Means we can show config variables nicely in phpPgAdmin like
phpMyAdmin does...

Chris