From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | pg_stat_reset() weirdness |
Date: | 2002-08-09 05:49:18 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEJNCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi guys,
If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix
the regression test to exclude this function?
Chris
*** ./expected/opr_sanity.out Fri Jul 19 07:11:32 2002
--- ./results/opr_sanity.out Fri Aug 9 13:26:00 2002
***************
*** 27,34 ****
AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$'
AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';
oid | proname
! -----+---------
! (0 rows)
-- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes).
-- (This test should be dead code now that we have the unique index
--- 27,35 ----
AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$'
AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';
oid | proname
! ------+---------------
! 2249 | pg_stat_reset
! (1 row)
-- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes).
-- (This test should be dead code now that we have the unique index
======================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-08-09 06:34:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2002-08-09 05:07:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS |