| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, <cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
| Date: | 2002-07-31 02:44:26 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEGNCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 08:53, cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com wrote:
> > > Just a long standing curiosity?
> > e) Inertia. MySQL got more popular way back when; the reasons
> may no longer
>
> f) Win32 Support. I can download a setup.exe for mysql and have it up
> and running quickly on Windows. I think that native Win32 support will
> go a long way toward making Postgres more "popular"
Speaking of that - wasn't someone going to branch the CVS with a whole lot
of Win32 support stuff? Jan?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-07-31 03:03:56 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-31 02:43:30 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |