| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OK, lets talk portability. |
| Date: | 2002-05-08 01:57:23 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOKEHPCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Just a note:
Apache 2.0.36 just released and this is in the release notes:
*) Deprecated the apr_lock.h API. Please see the following files
for the improved thread and process locking and signaling:
apr_proc_mutex.h, apr_thread_mutex.h, apr_thread_rwlock.h,
apr_thread_cond.h, and apr_global_mutex.h. [Aaron Bannert]
Chris
> > By the time of the fork(), not much has been done. Some needed
> > calculations can simply be stored into shared memory (which is trivial
> > to implement). Some other tasks can simply be executed by the cloned
> > process, exactly as they were executed in the server.
> >
> > Using fork() on Win32 is pointless, hopless, awful. Don't even think
> > about it. It's a death warrant.
>
> Preaching to the choir my friend.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-05-08 02:05:21 | Re: code contribution |
| Previous Message | Ryan Bradetich | 2002-05-08 01:42:04 | Re: a couple of minor itches: RI Trigger Names, and |