Re: Postgres 7.2.2 Segment Error

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Brett Toolin" <brett(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.2.2 Segment Error
Date: 2002-09-20 04:18:39
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOKEFLCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Index Scan using users_sessions_cha_name_idx on users_sessions
> > (cost=0.00..12738.07 rows=1275 width=6) (actual
> time=231.74..239.39 rows=2
> > loops=1)
> > Total runtime: 239.81 msec
> >
> > EXPLAIN
> >
> > The size of the table:
> >
> > canaveral# ls -al 44632
> > -rw------- 1 pgsql pgsql 357130240 Sep 19 18:52 44632
>
> This seems remarkably large. Does pg_filedump reveal anything of interest?

Where on earth do I find that?

BTW - I want to vacuum full this table but I'm holding off until someone
like Tom tells me there's nothing more to be gained from it...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2002-09-20 04:31:46 Re: Win32 rename()/unlink() questions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-20 04:05:27 Re: Win32 rename()/unlink() questions