Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Sean Chittenden" <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Date: 2002-09-19 03:32:41
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOKEEPCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I completely agree with Bruce here. Requiring an initdb for every beta
> release significantly reduces the number of people who will be willing
> to try it out -- so initdb's between betas are not disasterous, but
> should be avoided if possible.

But it does mean that 7.3 to 7.3 pg_dump gets a good testing...

You could almost make it mandatory to have an initdb during beta :)

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-19 03:33:00 Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-09-19 03:29:38 Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)