Re: RULE regression test failure

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RULE regression test failure
Date: 2002-08-30 07:02:59
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOIEPJCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
> that the different output order must reflect a platform-specific
> difference in qsort()'s treatment of equal keys.
>
> Probably the best answer is to add "ORDER BY shoename" to the test
> query to eliminate the platform dependency. Any objections out there?

None here.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-30 07:08:54 Re: Fulltextindex
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-30 07:00:52 Re: RULE regression test failure