Re: Second call for platform testing

Fair enough.

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Friday, 30 November 2001 9:55 AM
> To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Second call for platform testing
>
>
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Has someone thought about getting a sourceforge account for postgres or
> > something? Even if we don't use their CVS and facilities, I
> wonder if we
> > can use their compile farm for platform testing?
>
> Hardly need a project account. I have a personal account at
> sourceforge, and have used it (fairly recently, even) to run tests on
> their compile farm. They don't presently have all that wide a range of
> stuff available however. Let's see ....
>
> lqqqqqqqqChoose compile farm server...qqqqqqqqqk
> x A. [x86] Linux 2.2 (Debian 2.2) x
> x C. [x86] FreeBSD (4.3-RELEASE) x
> x x
> x G. [Alpha] Linux 2.2 (Debian 2.2) x
> x x
> x I. [PPC - G4] MacOS X 10.1 #1 **NEW** x
> x J. [PPC - G4] MacOS X 10.1 #2 **NEW** x
> x K. [PPC - RS/6000] Linux 2.2 (Debian 2.2) x
> x x
> x L. [Sparc - Ultra60] Linux 2.2 (Debian 2.2) x
> x M. [Sparc - R220] Sun Solaris (8) #1 x
> x N. [Sparc - R220] Sun Solaris (8) #2 x
> x O. [Sparc - R220] Sun Solaris (8) #3 x
> x P. [Sparc - R220] Sun Solaris (8) #4 x
> x x
> x Exit x
> mqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqj
>
> With the possible exception of the Linux/Alpha box, there's nothing
> there that we don't have covered already, is there?
>
> regards, tom lane
>