| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector |
| Date: | 2002-07-29 06:34:45 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEGECDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
OK, now I run it and it does absolutely nothing to the pg_stat_all_tables
relation for instance. In fact, it seems to do nothing at all - does the
reset function even work?
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Monday, 29 July 2002 2:19 PM
> To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Cc: Jan Wieck; Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Stats Collector
>
>
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Is it something to do with the return type being declared wrongly?
>
> Yup. Make it return a useless '1' or 'true' or some such.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-29 07:06:05 | Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-29 06:18:48 | Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-29 07:06:05 | Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-29 06:18:48 | Re: [GENERAL] Stats Collector |