From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "John Gray" <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation |
Date: | 2002-04-15 01:23:21 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEBOCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
I'll give it a try sometime today.
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Monday, 15 April 2002 7:57 AM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: John Gray; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Commands/ directory reorganisation
>
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, what time timeframe are we in for application of this patch? If I
> > get OK from a few people in the next few hours, do I apply so the code
> > doesn't drift?
>
> We should apply (or reject) quickly, since as long as the patch is
> outstanding it will be holding up other work in backend/commands/.
> I know it's in my way for further schema work, for example.
>
> I'll try to look it over this evening; anyone else want to review it?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-15 01:36:45 | Re: BETWEEN Help |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-15 00:34:50 | Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation |