Re: help with bison

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: help with bison
Date: 2002-04-11 02:54:14
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEBFCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Out of interest, since the FE/BE protocol apprently doesn't support prepared
statements (bound variables), what does this patch actually _do_?

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Neil Conway
> Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 9:29 AM
> To: PostgreSQL Hackers
> Subject: [HACKERS] help with bison
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on a fairly large patch (cleaning up Karel Zak's
> PREPARE/EXECUTE work), and I'm having some problems with bison (I'm
> a yacc newbie). In fact, my grammar currently has an obscene
> 20 shift/reduce and 4 reduce/reduce conflicts!
>
> Would someone to be kind enough to let me know what I'm doing wrong,
> and what I'll need to change? (Unfortunately, bison isn't very
> helpful: it doesn't provide line-numbers when it warns me about
> the # of conflicts). The patch for gram.y is below.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-11 03:00:11 Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2002-04-11 02:44:13 Re: help with bison