From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: help with bison |
Date: | 2002-04-11 02:54:14 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEBFCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Out of interest, since the FE/BE protocol apprently doesn't support prepared
statements (bound variables), what does this patch actually _do_?
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Neil Conway
> Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 9:29 AM
> To: PostgreSQL Hackers
> Subject: [HACKERS] help with bison
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on a fairly large patch (cleaning up Karel Zak's
> PREPARE/EXECUTE work), and I'm having some problems with bison (I'm
> a yacc newbie). In fact, my grammar currently has an obscene
> 20 shift/reduce and 4 reduce/reduce conflicts!
>
> Would someone to be kind enough to let me know what I'm doing wrong,
> and what I'll need to change? (Unfortunately, bison isn't very
> helpful: it doesn't provide line-numbers when it warns me about
> the # of conflicts). The patch for gram.y is below.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-11 03:00:11 | Re: BETWEEN SYMMETRIC/ASYMMETRIC |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2002-04-11 02:44:13 | Re: help with bison |