Re: getpid() function

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getpid() function
Date: 2002-08-02 08:50:13
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEHOCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > For example convert(), all datetype function like int(). The name
> > convenition must be like names in group 1/
>
> FYI, I have been proposing SQL99 compatible convert(). I would like to
> add it if no one objects.

No objection, but what does it do out of interest? Will it cause a
backwards compatibility problem at all?

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yaroslav Dmitriev 2002-08-02 08:59:19 []performance issues
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-08-02 08:38:37 Re: getpid() function

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yaroslav Dmitriev 2002-08-02 08:59:19 []performance issues
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2002-08-02 08:38:37 Re: getpid() function