Re: question on backends

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: question on backends
Date: 2002-07-30 01:28:31
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEGGCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ah yes - that was me making an unfortunate exptrapolation without thinking
it through.

Of course, PHP implements persistent connections for you, etc., etc., not
the postgres client library.

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Conway [mailto:nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 30 July 2002 12:11 AM
> To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Cc: Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] question on backends
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:28:54PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > libpq has a function pconnect as opposed to connect that will do it.
>
> libpq has neither function, AFAIK.
>
> As for persistent backends, it's on the TODO list, but I'm not aware
> that anyone has put any work into implementing it. At the moment,
> a backend connects to a single database for its entire lifecycle -- so
> you'd either need one pool of persistent backends for each database
> in use, or you'd need to allow a backend to change the database it is
> connected to.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-07-30 01:38:00 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Stephen Deasey 2002-07-30 00:27:40 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL