| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Kaare Rasmussen" <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |
| Date: | 2002-01-08 03:58:11 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEANCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
> earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
> grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
> having the shift/reduce issues resolved...
I might be thicker than a whale sandwich (10 points if you can pick the
quote :) ), but can someone please tell me what a shift/reduce issue is,
exactly...
Thanks,
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-08 04:01:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-08 03:48:04 | Re: ecpg compile error on AIX |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-08 04:01:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-01-08 03:47:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |