Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?
Date: 2002-02-13 04:45:44
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCEFPCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I vote for a fork - 7.2 seems to be very stable (as it should be after a
year!)

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 11:18 AM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?
>
>
>
> Definitely agree on the itchiness, especially with the broken planner in
> v7.2? :)
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I'm getting itchy to get to work on 7.3 development, and with so few
> > bug reports coming in for 7.2, it seems that now is not too soon to
> > split off the 7.2 maintenance branch in CVS. Comments?
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Alphonse 2002-02-13 05:03:03 Connection Pooling
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-02-13 04:21:52 Re: feature request START WITH ... CONNECT BY