Re: beta3

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta3
Date: 2001-11-20 01:42:01
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAEHJCAAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> Sent: Monday, 19 November 2001 10:40 PM
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: Tom Lane; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta3
>
>
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > Okay, how do we want to address/fix/test this?
>
> Assuming that we don't want to make sweeping changes to the overall
> procedure, I suggest this:
>
> 1. The postgres.tar.gz and man.tar.gz documentation tarballs required for
> a release used to be at ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/dev/doc/. The new
> file system location of this directory needs to be determined.
>
> 2. Some postgres.tar.gz and man.tar.gz files need to be put there.

Just a thought: Doesn't everyone have bzip2 these days? Many large
projects come bz2-only even these days. Is there a good reason to stick
with the extra-large tar.gz format?

Chris

In response to

  • Re: beta3 at 2001-11-19 14:39:52 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

  • Re: beta3 at 2001-11-20 01:49:20 from Marc G. Fournier

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-11-20 01:49:20 Re: beta3
Previous Message Andrew McMillan 2001-11-20 01:23:24 Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete