Re: updated qCache

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: updated qCache
Date: 2002-04-18 04:16:55
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAEDCCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> > I'm planning to re-implement PREPARE/EXECUTE with support only
> > for locally-prepared plans, using the existing patch as a
> > guide. The result should be a simpler patch -- once it's
> > in CVS we can worry about more advanced plan caching
> > techiques. Any complaints/comments on this plan?
>
> That's what I wanted from day one ;-)

You know, if we had a threaded backend, we wouldn't have any of these
problems :)

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-18 04:28:58 Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-18 04:15:53 Re: updated qCache