Re: WWW interface for postgres

From: "Karen Ellrick" <k-ellrick(at)sctech(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WWW interface for postgres
Date: 2001-10-16 10:41:26
Message-ID: GAELLCMOCEGMDMHDMIILIEIKCPAA.k-ellrick@sctech.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Pardon the message from me that appears like a dumb question, since the
answer came an hour prior. I wrote the message not long after the Debian
message (with a link to Greatbridge) came in, but for some strange reason
mine didn't appear in the list for about four hours. In the meantime,
speedboy put the solution on sourceforge and told the list about it. I had
already thanked him (off-list, because I thought the list was dropping my
messages) and downloaded phpPgAdmin 2.3 when my original question showed up.
What in the world is going on with this list lately?

Meanwhile, my first question is still valid - it's a spooky feeling to see
your own domain name show up, married with someone else's username, as a
return address on a message that you know neither you (nor anyone else in
your domain - in my case I am the only English speaker) wrote. Did others
get the same message as coming from Debian(at)their(dot)own(dot)domain, or were all the
copies with mine (sctech.co.jp)?

--------------------------------
Karen Ellrick
S & C Technology, Inc.
1-21-35 Kusatsu-shinmachi
Hiroshima 733-0834 Japan
(from U.S. 011-81, from Japan 0) 82-293-2838
--------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Karen Ellrick
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:36 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] WWW interface for postgres
>
>
> Before I ask my main question, what sort of return address is this? The
> domain is that of my own company, and I know that there is no user named
> Debian here. Is it some sort of anonymity trick, and every recipient sees
> their own domain in that spot? Can Mr. Debian explain this?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of
> > Debian(at)sctech(dot)co(dot)jp
> > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:30 PM
> > To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] WWW interface for postgres
>
>
> Now to my main question:
>
> > phpPgAdmin (in last it is:
> > http://www.greatbridge.org/project/phppgadmin)
>
> It just so happens that right now, about an hour after reading
> that message,
> I discovered that I need such a thing (been asked to pass
> administration of
> my database over to a coworker who doesn't know SQL and likes to use his
> 'Doze PC rather than the Linux server console). But the link
> given above is
> dead (no surprise - there was much discussion on this list about
> Greatbridge
> going away), and although there are references to stable releases
> as high as
> 2.3 and Beta 3.0 on other sites, the download links are all disabled. The
> most recent downloadable file I could find is 2.2.1, and there was mention
> of security bugs with anything below 2.3. Does anyone know where
> I can get
> 2.3 or Beta 3.0 (if it's pretty stable)?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --------------------------------
> Karen Ellrick
> S & C Technology, Inc.
> 1-21-35 Kusatsu-shinmachi
> Hiroshima 733-0834 Japan
> (from U.S. 011-81, from Japan 0) 82-293-2838
> --------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Robert Norris 2001-10-16 12:00:35 Python interface memory leak?
Previous Message Henshall, Stuart - WCP 2001-10-16 10:09:45 Re: WWW interface for postgres