Re: serverless postgresql

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
To: Jeff Bowden <jlb(at)houseofdistraction(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: serverless postgresql
Date: 2004-01-14 01:35:56
Message-ID: FFF35B3C-4631-11D8-9A44-000393CFE6B8@spy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jan 13, 2004, at 13:38, Jeff Bowden wrote:

> but it seems conceptually cleaner to not have a seperate process at
> all.

That depends a lot on what you mean by cleaner. A few small programs
in their own process space dedicated to a specific set of functionality
with well-defined interfaces can make for a much more reliable
application (see postfix).

--
Dustin Sallings

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-01-14 01:37:14 Re: serverless postgresql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-14 01:15:41 Re: dump/restore problem